Very interesting article and agnotology is a subject I'll be trying to get my head around as it's obviously a very important one.
"For example, our precise dilation on an object automatically excludes other potential foci. Knowledge is hidden from us simply due to our habit of attending to the world. A hunter or an artist will have a vastly different experience of the same landscape.
From another perspective, our location in relation to knowledge may advantage or disadvantage us. The unfortunate inhabitants of Hiroshima, left with no sense of what was coming, were turned “into a shadow on the asphalt?” Who didn’t turn up for work at the Twin Towers on 11th September 2001?"
My pet subject is 9/11 and no staged event could exemplify how focus has been used to make the rejecters of the official narrative get the reality wrong - right in rejecting the ludicrous narrative of 19 terrorists armed with boxcutters laying low the best-defended country in the world but wrong in understanding the true nature of the event which was that it was a massive demolition job in the form of a Full-Scale Anti-Terror Exercise where death and injury were staged pushed out as a terrorist attack.
For example, the purpose of showcasing WTC-7's collapse from seven vantage points was to distract us from the far more revealing planes (faked airliner crashes means faked passenger deaths and also means by definition controlled destruction of the buildings - we don't need to spend a second on the buildings when we prove faked crashes). What the propagandists know is that it doesn't matter how Emperor's New Clothes-ish something is, no matter how utterly unmistakable WTC-7's destruction was a controlled demolition, ~90% of the population will accept fire as cause which means effectively the perps have a "propaganda playground" to do what they like to target the ~10% of those independently-minded enough to reject their nonsense ... so that everyone gets it wrong.
This highly-produced video, made to Tom Petty's Free Fallin' which showcases WTC-7's destruction from seven vantage points as well as reporters alluding to controlled demolition (clearly scripted not candidly alluding) was made by the PROPAGANDISTS not the rejecters of the narrative - we are not told who sang it or who made it. I cannot help taking my hat off to them, it's fantastic! They simply know that they can get away with anything and do it all Hidden in Plain Sight aka Revelation of the Method style. https://youtu.be/Vgx8Uwo-Vxc
This is another song the propagandists did: I Believe in Miracles, which uses the words of genuine analysts. Bet they had a laugh over that one. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71fwKA9Udso
"Who didn't turn up for work at the WTC," is pure propaganda to reinforce to the rejecters that PEOPLE DIED!
What does astound me I have to say is the fact that prominent 9/11 scholar, Graeme MacQueen, who sadly died from cancer recently, analysed the alleged 118 "oral" histories of the WTC firefighters for their references to incriminating explosions ... but failed to notice:
--- not one of these alleged testimonies contained a single reference to the alleged 343 deaths of the firefighters' colleagues
--- the "transcripts" are chock full of nonsensicalities, eg, routes that make no sense, things that don't add up timewise, equipment that wouldn't have been used, etc
No doubt Graeme questioned this lack but where is the "orality" of these testimonies? Where's the audio? If we can have hours and hours of audio of communications between the astronauts and mission control (the one event I believe) where's the audio of these testimonies?
Just to say that the evidence shows that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were fire-bombed just like the other Japanese cities. The destruction profiles of those two cities and Tokyo (an admitted fire-bombing) are identical. Nuclear bombs are just another hoax!
Thanks for comment, Petra. Yes, that question of how attend the world is an interesting. I have a two volume on my shelf titled “The Matter With Things”, It is by a psychiatrist with a background in English literature. He has revisited the right / left brain debate and has been a leading driver of it over the last 15 years. I find what he has to say compelling. He argues, unlike the trivialising of the subject, the left and right hemispheres are both involved in every activity engaging the brain.
The difference Is in emphasis or who is in control. The left hemisphere is dominant when you know what you are looking for and offers a narrowed focus. This is equally true with birds. When they are looking for a grain of seed in gravel, the left hemisphere is in control and a narrow attention applies. If it were looking out for predators an open attention is involved before the brains locks onto an object. This fits the idea of the hunter and the artist. I strongly recommend Ian McGilchrist’s first book: “The Master and His Emissary”.
On 9/11, I am ashamed to say I only came to an understanding of that quite late but will put my money on inside job. Catherine Austen Fitts story of the last paper trail in Building 7 is another important part of the story. I know you are up to speed on that too. I may have seen the video you were discussing that described media helicopter being allowed to capture footage that brought much of the story into doubt.
I will follow up your substack work and the links you have provided. Going back to McGilchrist , he argues that we may be living in a world that is increasingly left hemisphere dominant. The sad thing about the left hemisphere is that it doesn’t know what it doesn’t know. I can be narrow in focus. Nothing explains how many of my former leftish friends refused to be curious. Curiosity is the domain of the right hemisphere.
Just to say, Warren, I don't think you quite got my comment: WTC-7 is distraction propaganda. I tend to think that Catherine Austen Fitts is a controlled opposition agent but regardless of whether she is or not anything to do with WTC-7 and the buildings in general is distraction from the more revealing planes. 9/11 was an "inside job" but not the inside job most people who recognise it as an inside job think it was. They staged the death and injury and had a massive propaganda campaign targeted to the anticipated disbelievers of their nonsense story to maintain their belief in real death and injury.
Yes it is but in psyops - the big ones at least - you know that in addition to the false narrative targeted to the anticipated accepters there will be at least one false narrative targeted to the anticipated rejecters and when you know that you know what to look for. What you also know is:
--- In psyops they do what they want for real and fake the rest (it's a psyop after all which are all about magician's tricks not doing things for real over here to help make you believe dupery over there - it's all dupery unless they want it! I knew as soon as covid hit that there would be no virus because we could see it wasn't a case of their wanting an actual virus, they only wanted us to believe in one. As counterintuitive as it seems, propaganda works better the less it corresponds with reality and that is evidenced so well in their nonsense narratives.)
--- Underneath all the magic propaganda dust they make it clear what the truth is.
Hypothetically, if I'd understood psyops as well as I do know before 9/11, as soon as 9/11 happened I would have worked out immediately that:
--- the airliner crashes were faked so passenger deaths were faked
--- all the images provided to us of injured people around the buildings perfectly fit "drill" injured with none of them corresponding to the maiming and other serious injury we'd expect from people injured in 110-storey building collapses.
Thus immediately I would have known that 9/11 was a demolition job cum massive Full-Scale Anti-Terror Exercise where the planes and death and injury were faked. So simple really ... when you know the fundamentals.
Hi Petra and Warren, this is a great discussion! I'm just wondering Petra: have you explored the "in addition to the false narrative targeted to the anticipated accepters there will be at least one false narrative targeted to the anticipated rejecters" in relation to JJ Couey's hypothesis about the pandemonium, namely that a major false narrative that is still pushed by/believed by a majority of Covid-dissidents is that of "the worst case scenario" that there was a deadly virus/bioW that spread around the world that either killed millions or could have been prevented by the repurposed drugs...a false narrative that diverts us from what they actually did to simulate a deadly pandemic in NY, Italy, etc? As a former biologist I find Couey's deconstructing of the worst-case-scenario tales from some of our favourite dissidents highly thought provoking.
Thanks for this. What is your reading on pysops? Or how did you work it out. "there will be at least one false narrative targeted to the anticipated rejecters" caught my interest.
9/11 is a wonderful blueprint - when you understand 9/11 you understand the psyops before it and after it wherever they happen to be.
I woke up to 9/11 being an inside job after watching the film, JFK to 9/11 Everything is a Rich Man's Trick. Two years later I came across Simon Shack's work on the fakery of dead people at which point I believed some deaths were faked because I knew the airliner crashes were faked which means no one died in a plane and I could see that some people in the buildings were also faked however I was still under the spell of some of the propaganda targeted to the anticipated rejecters of the narrative aimed at maintaining belief in real death and injury and so I thought some fake, some real for a couple of years.
Then one day I had a very visceral epiphany where it hit me: death and injury in general were faked and there was a massive propaganda campaign targeted to the anticipated rejecters of the narrative to maintain their belief in real death and injury.
Included in the propaganda campaign targeted to the rejecters were:
--- Alleged loved ones or colleagues of people who'd allegedly died or were injured aligning themselves with the rejecters to "search for answers" (Bob McIlvaine, the Jersey Widows, April Gallop, Richard Grove, Matt Campbell)
--- Casting lots of suspicion on Israelis being in the twin towers and involved in the demolitions (which isn't to say they weren't involved but it's a way of suggesting "outsiders" were hired to do the dastardly deed rather than say US company, Controlled Demolition, Inc (CDI) who they told us were hired to clean up the rubble - as if they also weren't involved in the demolitions, pleeaaze)
--- Films such as Conspiracy Solved! by Jeremy Rys (aka Alien Scientist) pointing out all the suspicious companies in the twin towers and making claims that certain people were targeted to be killed in both the twin towers and the Pentagon.
--- Various agency staff and academics spreading propaganda
--- Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth - while I have no doubt that many members of this group are genuine it is essentially a controlled opposition organisation focusing all the attention on the buildings and keeping it well away from the fakery of the death and injury
--- The Lawyers' Committee for 9/11 Inquiry is an organisation of the same ilk as A&E above.
Thanks John. I had to look that one up. The ivermectin story is a sad one but Pierre Kory can make you laugh about how awful the process was. Here he is at Darling Harbour in Sydney last March sharing the findings in his book. A remarkable man. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4GeOiJ7360
I used it. Found it in Brookvale in Sydney. I don't know whether I had anything. Wouldn't do the tests. Didn't Uttar Pradesh make good use of it? In the article, it refers to Paul Marik. It is sad what he and his colleagues were put through.
An excellent commentary, thank you very much - I thoroughly enjoyed reading this piece. Confirms so much.
Very interesting article and agnotology is a subject I'll be trying to get my head around as it's obviously a very important one.
"For example, our precise dilation on an object automatically excludes other potential foci. Knowledge is hidden from us simply due to our habit of attending to the world. A hunter or an artist will have a vastly different experience of the same landscape.
From another perspective, our location in relation to knowledge may advantage or disadvantage us. The unfortunate inhabitants of Hiroshima, left with no sense of what was coming, were turned “into a shadow on the asphalt?” Who didn’t turn up for work at the Twin Towers on 11th September 2001?"
My pet subject is 9/11 and no staged event could exemplify how focus has been used to make the rejecters of the official narrative get the reality wrong - right in rejecting the ludicrous narrative of 19 terrorists armed with boxcutters laying low the best-defended country in the world but wrong in understanding the true nature of the event which was that it was a massive demolition job in the form of a Full-Scale Anti-Terror Exercise where death and injury were staged pushed out as a terrorist attack.
For example, the purpose of showcasing WTC-7's collapse from seven vantage points was to distract us from the far more revealing planes (faked airliner crashes means faked passenger deaths and also means by definition controlled destruction of the buildings - we don't need to spend a second on the buildings when we prove faked crashes). What the propagandists know is that it doesn't matter how Emperor's New Clothes-ish something is, no matter how utterly unmistakable WTC-7's destruction was a controlled demolition, ~90% of the population will accept fire as cause which means effectively the perps have a "propaganda playground" to do what they like to target the ~10% of those independently-minded enough to reject their nonsense ... so that everyone gets it wrong.
This highly-produced video, made to Tom Petty's Free Fallin' which showcases WTC-7's destruction from seven vantage points as well as reporters alluding to controlled demolition (clearly scripted not candidly alluding) was made by the PROPAGANDISTS not the rejecters of the narrative - we are not told who sang it or who made it. I cannot help taking my hat off to them, it's fantastic! They simply know that they can get away with anything and do it all Hidden in Plain Sight aka Revelation of the Method style. https://youtu.be/Vgx8Uwo-Vxc
This is another song the propagandists did: I Believe in Miracles, which uses the words of genuine analysts. Bet they had a laugh over that one. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71fwKA9Udso
"Who didn't turn up for work at the WTC," is pure propaganda to reinforce to the rejecters that PEOPLE DIED!
What does astound me I have to say is the fact that prominent 9/11 scholar, Graeme MacQueen, who sadly died from cancer recently, analysed the alleged 118 "oral" histories of the WTC firefighters for their references to incriminating explosions ... but failed to notice:
--- not one of these alleged testimonies contained a single reference to the alleged 343 deaths of the firefighters' colleagues
--- the "transcripts" are chock full of nonsensicalities, eg, routes that make no sense, things that don't add up timewise, equipment that wouldn't have been used, etc
No doubt Graeme questioned this lack but where is the "orality" of these testimonies? Where's the audio? If we can have hours and hours of audio of communications between the astronauts and mission control (the one event I believe) where's the audio of these testimonies?
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/nonsensicalities-in-the-911-firefighter
Just to say that the evidence shows that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were fire-bombed just like the other Japanese cities. The destruction profiles of those two cities and Tokyo (an admitted fire-bombing) are identical. Nuclear bombs are just another hoax!
https://occamsrazorterrorevents.weebly.com/nuclear-weapons-hoax.html
Thanks for comment, Petra. Yes, that question of how attend the world is an interesting. I have a two volume on my shelf titled “The Matter With Things”, It is by a psychiatrist with a background in English literature. He has revisited the right / left brain debate and has been a leading driver of it over the last 15 years. I find what he has to say compelling. He argues, unlike the trivialising of the subject, the left and right hemispheres are both involved in every activity engaging the brain.
The difference Is in emphasis or who is in control. The left hemisphere is dominant when you know what you are looking for and offers a narrowed focus. This is equally true with birds. When they are looking for a grain of seed in gravel, the left hemisphere is in control and a narrow attention applies. If it were looking out for predators an open attention is involved before the brains locks onto an object. This fits the idea of the hunter and the artist. I strongly recommend Ian McGilchrist’s first book: “The Master and His Emissary”.
On 9/11, I am ashamed to say I only came to an understanding of that quite late but will put my money on inside job. Catherine Austen Fitts story of the last paper trail in Building 7 is another important part of the story. I know you are up to speed on that too. I may have seen the video you were discussing that described media helicopter being allowed to capture footage that brought much of the story into doubt.
I will follow up your substack work and the links you have provided. Going back to McGilchrist , he argues that we may be living in a world that is increasingly left hemisphere dominant. The sad thing about the left hemisphere is that it doesn’t know what it doesn’t know. I can be narrow in focus. Nothing explains how many of my former leftish friends refused to be curious. Curiosity is the domain of the right hemisphere.
"Nothing explains how many of my former leftish friends refused to be curious. Curiosity is the domain of the right hemisphere."
Curiosity is stamped out when we attend the schooled daze.
Training focuses on remembering the RIGHT answers. Regurgitation of the story or theory.
I have a few paradigm busting articles on mammalian physiology you may find of interest if you don't have sacred cows grazing in your garden.
We breathe air not oxygen
Demonstration of how oxygen becomes nitrogen
How does salt restriction lead to heart dis-ease and fear based reactionary thinking?
Mammalian physiology is based around hydration NOT oxygenation.
Oxygen being detrimental to our lungs because it is a dehydrator. Oxygen being primarily prescribed for terminal illness. Palliative care is not kind.
Oxygen and nitrogen are products of air NOT constituents of air.
Click on my blue icon to read. All free.
Thanks Jane. I will definitely have a look.
I will look up the books you recommend.
Just to say, Warren, I don't think you quite got my comment: WTC-7 is distraction propaganda. I tend to think that Catherine Austen Fitts is a controlled opposition agent but regardless of whether she is or not anything to do with WTC-7 and the buildings in general is distraction from the more revealing planes. 9/11 was an "inside job" but not the inside job most people who recognise it as an inside job think it was. They staged the death and injury and had a massive propaganda campaign targeted to the anticipated disbelievers of their nonsense story to maintain their belief in real death and injury.
I bow to your greater knowledge.. This world of deceit is a messy one.
Yes it is but in psyops - the big ones at least - you know that in addition to the false narrative targeted to the anticipated accepters there will be at least one false narrative targeted to the anticipated rejecters and when you know that you know what to look for. What you also know is:
--- In psyops they do what they want for real and fake the rest (it's a psyop after all which are all about magician's tricks not doing things for real over here to help make you believe dupery over there - it's all dupery unless they want it! I knew as soon as covid hit that there would be no virus because we could see it wasn't a case of their wanting an actual virus, they only wanted us to believe in one. As counterintuitive as it seems, propaganda works better the less it corresponds with reality and that is evidenced so well in their nonsense narratives.)
--- Underneath all the magic propaganda dust they make it clear what the truth is.
Hypothetically, if I'd understood psyops as well as I do know before 9/11, as soon as 9/11 happened I would have worked out immediately that:
--- the airliner crashes were faked so passenger deaths were faked
--- all the images provided to us of injured people around the buildings perfectly fit "drill" injured with none of them corresponding to the maiming and other serious injury we'd expect from people injured in 110-storey building collapses.
Thus immediately I would have known that 9/11 was a demolition job cum massive Full-Scale Anti-Terror Exercise where the planes and death and injury were faked. So simple really ... when you know the fundamentals.
Hi Petra and Warren, this is a great discussion! I'm just wondering Petra: have you explored the "in addition to the false narrative targeted to the anticipated accepters there will be at least one false narrative targeted to the anticipated rejecters" in relation to JJ Couey's hypothesis about the pandemonium, namely that a major false narrative that is still pushed by/believed by a majority of Covid-dissidents is that of "the worst case scenario" that there was a deadly virus/bioW that spread around the world that either killed millions or could have been prevented by the repurposed drugs...a false narrative that diverts us from what they actually did to simulate a deadly pandemic in NY, Italy, etc? As a former biologist I find Couey's deconstructing of the worst-case-scenario tales from some of our favourite dissidents highly thought provoking.
Thanks for this. What is your reading on pysops? Or how did you work it out. "there will be at least one false narrative targeted to the anticipated rejecters" caught my interest.
9/11 is a wonderful blueprint - when you understand 9/11 you understand the psyops before it and after it wherever they happen to be.
I woke up to 9/11 being an inside job after watching the film, JFK to 9/11 Everything is a Rich Man's Trick. Two years later I came across Simon Shack's work on the fakery of dead people at which point I believed some deaths were faked because I knew the airliner crashes were faked which means no one died in a plane and I could see that some people in the buildings were also faked however I was still under the spell of some of the propaganda targeted to the anticipated rejecters of the narrative aimed at maintaining belief in real death and injury and so I thought some fake, some real for a couple of years.
Then one day I had a very visceral epiphany where it hit me: death and injury in general were faked and there was a massive propaganda campaign targeted to the anticipated rejecters of the narrative to maintain their belief in real death and injury.
Included in the propaganda campaign targeted to the rejecters were:
--- Alleged loved ones or colleagues of people who'd allegedly died or were injured aligning themselves with the rejecters to "search for answers" (Bob McIlvaine, the Jersey Widows, April Gallop, Richard Grove, Matt Campbell)
--- Casting lots of suspicion on Israelis being in the twin towers and involved in the demolitions (which isn't to say they weren't involved but it's a way of suggesting "outsiders" were hired to do the dastardly deed rather than say US company, Controlled Demolition, Inc (CDI) who they told us were hired to clean up the rubble - as if they also weren't involved in the demolitions, pleeaaze)
--- Films such as Conspiracy Solved! by Jeremy Rys (aka Alien Scientist) pointing out all the suspicious companies in the twin towers and making claims that certain people were targeted to be killed in both the twin towers and the Pentagon.
--- Various agency staff and academics spreading propaganda
--- Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth - while I have no doubt that many members of this group are genuine it is essentially a controlled opposition organisation focusing all the attention on the buildings and keeping it well away from the fakery of the death and injury
--- The Lawyers' Committee for 9/11 Inquiry is an organisation of the same ilk as A&E above.
Thanks John. I had to look that one up. The ivermectin story is a sad one but Pierre Kory can make you laugh about how awful the process was. Here he is at Darling Harbour in Sydney last March sharing the findings in his book. A remarkable man. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4GeOiJ7360
I used it. Found it in Brookvale in Sydney. I don't know whether I had anything. Wouldn't do the tests. Didn't Uttar Pradesh make good use of it? In the article, it refers to Paul Marik. It is sad what he and his colleagues were put through.